Cristiano Ronaldo SIUUU Green Energy Live Wallpaper

AI Security Review

Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality moderate.

Cristiano Ronaldo SIUUU Green Energy Live Wallpaper is version 1.0.12 on the Chrome Web Store, published under the address [email protected]. Its manifest declares an empty permissions array and an empty host_permissions array. Chrome gives a new-tab-override extension nothing beyond the page it renders unless the manifest asks for more, and this package asks for nothing. The 201 findings divide into 182 IoC hits, 19 code-smell hits, and zero malware signatures, zero network findings, zero obfuscation findings, zero dependency findings and zero secret findings.

The IoC set carries no weight. Every entry traces to file_path "extracted_from_files", the extractor's catch-all bucket for strings pulled out of bundled JavaScript, and each one is a two- or three-character tail: XIOC-DOMAIN-h.bs, XIOC-DOMAIN-l.sa, XIOC-DOMAIN-c.sy, XIOC-DOMAIN-y.tui, XIOC-DOMAIN-br.sx. Several contain letters that cannot appear in a registrable domain at all, including XIOC-DOMAIN-ވm.kr (Dhivehi), XIOC-DOMAIN-ӌ.vc and XIOC-DOMAIN-т.fo (Cyrillic), and XIOC-DOMAIN-cŋҭ.sn. A DNS name carrying a Cyrillic т where the TLD sits cannot resolve in a browser. Those strings came out of minified identifiers, and the network_endpoints list repeats them; "custom.show" in that list has the shape of a property access on an object named custom.

The 19 low-severity code-smell findings are generic rules firing on ordinary JavaScript. None of them sit in the same file as a malware signature, which is the combination that would matter.

A skeptic would point at what the extension does. Replacing the new tab page is a classic hijack slot, and a wallpaper extension with no permissions still controls what you see when you open a tab. That much holds, and it is why static evidence cannot be the last word here: the chrome_url_overrides newtab key and the HTML it points to are where a hijack would live, and the scan returned no manifest-analysis findings to inspect. The evidence that would support a hijack claim is what is missing. No search or query domain appears among the IoCs, there is no history manipulation finding, no external transmission finding, and no network finding of any kind. The publisher is a plain Gmail address and the listing shows zero users, so the extension has no traffic to sell and no install history to judge either way.

On version 1.0.12 as scanned, the flagged strings come from the extractor and the extension's own code shows nothing harmful.

Key Reasons

• Zero malware signatures, zero network findings, zero obfuscation findings and zero secrets across all 201 findings
• All 182 IoCs trace to file_path 'extracted_from_files' and are two- or three-character domain fragments consistent with minified JavaScript
• Non-ASCII entries such as XIOC-DOMAIN-ވm.kr, XIOC-DOMAIN-ӌ.vc and XIOC-DOMAIN-cŋҭ.sn are character-level misparses, not resolvable domains
• Manifest declares no permissions and no host permissions
• No impersonation of a named extension; publisher is a generic Gmail address with zero users

False Positive Considerations

• XIOC extractor slicing minified JavaScript into domain-shaped fragments (h.bs, l.sa, e8.lt, bl.jm)
• Unicode letters inside extracted 'domains' (ވm.kr, cŋҭ.sn, т.fo), a known extractor artifact
• Property-access chains misread as endpoints (custom.show) rather than real network destinations
• 19 low-severity code-smell rules firing on ordinary bundled JavaScript with no co-located malware signature

Reviewed 2026-10-02; recommended action: suppress false positive; model confidence 78%.