OMICall
Score-based assessment (medium risk, 58/100). No analyst review available.
Analysis record
- Analysed
- 3 months ago
- Version
- v2.0.40
- Artifact
- SHA256 5CE…8A3
- Source
- Findings (non-IoC)
Evidence ledger
Ranked by severity · findings with a source location link to the code viewer
Network Indicators
Concrete URLs, domains, IPs, emails, and hashes extracted from the analyzed artifact.
Network indicators are queued for lazy loading
Scroll this section into view to load the detailed rows.
Publisher Evidence
Limited evidenceVihat Software
Publisher identity, store signals, distribution reach, and warning signals used for context. Treat this as supporting evidence, not a clean bill of health.
Firefox does not expose the same publisher verification data as IDE stores, so this score is deliberately conservative.
13 evidence rows available.
Finding Categories
Requested Permissions
4 permissionsAccess and modify data on every website you visit
AI Security Report
AI Security Review
Risky Plugins reviewed this extension with an AI-assisted security workflow on 2026-05-31. The review verdict is likely false positive with 80% confidence.
Recommended action: suppress false positive. Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality moderate.
The OMICall extension has a large number of IoC findings, with 390 medium-severity IoC detections. However, upon closer inspection, these findings appear to be driven by the XIOC extractor, which is known to produce false positives. The detected domains, such as n.top-m.top, a.va, and r.iidxes.url.host, do not seem to be suspicious or malicious. Additionally, there are only two network findings, one of which is a fetch call to a Hubspot JavaScript file. There are no malware signatures or obfuscation findings that would indicate malicious intent. The extension's description and functionality suggest that it is a legitimate VoIP call feature extension. A potential counterargument could be that the large number of IoC findings indicates a potential threat, but given the nature of the findings and the lack of other suspicious indicators, it is likely that these findings are false positives. Therefore, the extension is likely a false positive.
Key Reasons
- Large number of IoC findings driven by XIOC extractor
- No malware signatures or obfuscation findings
- Legitimate extension functionality and description
False Positive Considerations
- IoC extractor garbage
Source Code Not Available
Source code is not available for this version of the extension.
Frequently Asked Questions
Similar Extensions
Related extensions from the same publisher or marketplace