APIVoid Request Tester
The AI review rates the findings as likely false positive, but the risk score (40/100) still counts them.
Analysis record
- Analysed
- 3 months ago
- Version
- v1.0
- Artifact
- SHA256 03B…2DB
- Source
- Findings (non-IoC)
Evidence ledger
Ranked by severity · findings with a source location link to the code viewer
Network Indicators
Concrete URLs, domains, IPs, emails, and hashes extracted from the analyzed artifact.
Network indicators are queued for lazy loading
Scroll this section into view to load the detailed rows.
Publisher Evidence
Limited evidenceAPIVoid
Publisher identity, store signals, distribution reach, and warning signals used for context. Treat this as supporting evidence, not a clean bill of health.
Firefox does not expose the same publisher verification data as IDE stores, so this score is deliberately conservative.
13 evidence rows available.
Finding Categories
Requested Permissions
4 permissionsManage, modify, and monitor downloads
AI Security Report
AI Security Review
Risky Plugins reviewed this extension with an AI-assisted security workflow on 2026-05-31. The review verdict is likely false positive with 90% confidence.
Recommended action: no action. Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality strong.
The APIVoid Request Tester extension has a number of findings that are indicative of its intended functionality as an HTTP request testing tool. The XIOC extractor has detected several domains, including timings.total, profile.id, performance.now, sorted.map, reader.read, and tab.click, which appear to be related to the extension's functionality. Additionally, the extension makes a network call of type 'fetch' in the app.js file. However, none of these findings suggest malicious behavior. The extension's description and functionality are consistent with its intended purpose, and there is no evidence of malware signatures, obfuscation, or other suspicious behavior. One potential counterargument to this verdict is that the extension's lack of developer information and low user count could indicate a potential risk. However, in the absence of any concrete evidence of malicious behavior, this is not sufficient to overturn the verdict. The strongest counterargument would be that the extension's ability to make network requests and access certain domains could potentially be used for malicious purposes. However, this is a common functionality in many extensions, and without evidence of actual malicious behavior, it is not sufficient to justify a different verdict.
Key Reasons
- No malware signatures detected
- No obfuscation detected
- Extension functionality consistent with intended purpose
False Positive Considerations
- IoC extractor garbage
Source Code Not Available
Source code is not available for this version of the extension.
About This Extension
Frequently Asked Questions
Similar Extensions
Related extensions from the same publisher or marketplace