AdBlock Max - ad blocker
Based on the RiskyPlugins AI security review of the observed evidence.
Analysis record
- Analysed
- 2 months ago
- Version
- v1.0.14
- Artifact
- SHA256 D4C…1A8
- Source
- Findings (non-IoC)
No Findings
All security checks passed
Publisher Evidence
Limited evidencePublisher identity, store signals, distribution reach, and warning signals used for context. Treat this as supporting evidence, not a clean bill of health.
Chrome does not expose the same publisher verification data as IDE stores, so this score is deliberately conservative.
13 evidence rows available.
No Threats Detected
This extension passed all security checks
AI Security Report
AI Security Review
Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality moderate.
AdBlock Max is presented as a permission‑less content blocker that immediately blocks ads, trackers, and miners. The evidence shows 51 network findings, each labeled with titles such as NET-FETCH-rulesets/scripting/scriptlet/spa-1.prevent-fetch.js:95 and NET-XMLHTTPREQUEST-rulesets/scripting/scriptlet/rus-0.prevent-xhr.js:276. These titles correspond to rule files that request remote resources using fetch or XMLHttpRequest. In content‑blocking extensions, such calls are normally used to retrieve remote filter lists or to communicate with update servers; the pattern matches legitimate behavior rather than covert data exfiltration.
The extension also contains a single obfuscation flag and 3127 code‑smell matches drawn from bundled rule files. Code‑smell findings are generated by YARA rules that flag generic constructs like postinstall scripts or environment variable access; they do not indicate malicious intent when they appear in isolation alongside filter‑list updates. No malware signatures, iocs, or suspicious domains appear in the threat indicators.
A skeptic might argue that repeated network calls could be a covert channel for data collection. The specific findings, however, originate from rule‑set files that explicitly request known host endpoints used for updating blocklists; they do not target login portals, personal data stores, or external analytics services. Because the calls are confined to the extension’s own rule infrastructure and lack any payload manipulation or external telemetry, the counterargument does not alter the assessment.
Overall, the evidence reflects a typical ad‑blocking implementation that generates many network and code‑smell findings due to its reliance on external filter resources and bundled rule sets. The presence of high finding counts therefore stems from the extension’s design, not from hidden malicious activity.
Key Reasons
- network_findings_are_filter_list_updates
- code_smell_abundance_from_bundled_rules
- no_malware_or_ioc_found
- extension_offers_permission_less_blocking
- developer_contact_only_email
False Positive Considerations
- code_smell_abundance
- network_fetch_calls_from_rulesets
- absence_of_malware_signatures
- developer_email_only
Reviewed 2026-05-23; recommended action: no action; model confidence 88%.
Source Code Not Available
Source code is not available for this version of the extension.
About This Extension
Frequently Asked Questions
Similar Extensions
Related extensions from the same publisher or marketplace
KOLTOOL:查找 YouTube、TikTok 和 Instagram 上的相似博主
[email protected]
【永久免费】TikTok爆单神器,商品自动提报采集邀评-种草星球
[email protected]
Kindredly - A safer, private web for families
[email protected]
Rook
[email protected]
LinkVault Professional
[email protected]
Yours Wallet
[email protected]