Zent Translate
The AI review rates the findings as likely false positive, but the risk score (55/100) still counts them.
Analysis record
- Analysed
- 3 weeks ago
- Version
- v5.3.6
- Artifact
- SHA256 305…7A8
- Source
- Findings (non-IoC)
Evidence ledger
Ranked by severity · findings with a source location link to the code viewer
Publisher Evidence
Limited evidencePublisher identity, store signals, distribution reach, and warning signals used for context. Treat this as supporting evidence, not a clean bill of health.
Chrome does not expose the same publisher verification data as IDE stores, so this score is deliberately conservative.
12 evidence rows available.
Finding Categories
Requested Permissions
20 permissionsAI Security Report
AI Security Review
Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality moderate.
The Zent Translate extension triggers multiple network findings, including NET-FETCH-background.js-1 and NET-FETCH-content-scripts/slash-command-iframe.js-1, indicating potential communication with external servers. However, these findings alone do not necessarily imply malicious behavior, as they could be related to the extension's translation functionality. The presence of obfuscation patterns, such as OBFUSCATION-SUSPICIOUS_EXTERNAL_IMPORT-background.js-0 and OBFUSCATION-UNICODE_HEAVY-content-scripts/content.js-1, raises some concerns, but it is essential to consider the context and potential false positives. A counterargument to the verdict could be that the extension's developer, [email protected], may be using obfuscation techniques for legitimate purposes, such as protecting intellectual property. However, without further information about the developer's intentions and the extension's behavior, it is challenging to determine the validity of this claim. Given the lack of concrete evidence of malicious behavior, such as malware signatures or suspicious domain connections, and considering the potential for false positives, the extension is likely a false positive. The high number of users (100,000) and the extension's description as a 'Fast and elegant translation extension' suggest that it may be a legitimate tool. Nevertheless, it is crucial to continue monitoring the extension's behavior and updating the analysis as new information becomes available.
Key Reasons
- Network findings without clear malicious intent
- Obfuscation patterns without concrete evidence of malicious behavior
- Lack of malware signatures or suspicious domain connections
False Positive Considerations
- IoC extractor garbage
- Obfuscation false positives
Reviewed 2026-05-23; recommended action: monitor; model confidence 70%.
Chrome version history
Risk trend by version
10 analyzed versions. Each point is the latest successful scan for that version; failed zero-score scans are hidden. Dates are based on first seen by risky plugins.
Pick any point on the chart to explore that version's code below.
Source Code Not Available
Source code is not available for this version of the extension.
About This Extension
Frequently Asked Questions
Similar Extensions
Related extensions from the same publisher or marketplace
XB, block all ads
[email protected]
Google Translate in Side Panel
[email protected]
Pinterest Image Downloader | Futoo
[email protected]
YT Subtitle - Video Summarizer & Translator
[email protected]
gTab
[email protected]
ChatGPT Sidebar
[email protected]