JetBrains Marketplace Verified

Docker

by JetBrains · 32.0M users · 3.6 rating
b7782e7d-015a-5f77-a064-d007dd6f0dc7 | v263.6259.36
21/ 100
LOW risk
No change since v263.5701.46
Analyst verdict
No high-risk signal observed

Based on the RiskyPlugins AI security review of the observed evidence.

Analysis record

Analysed
Today
Version
v263.6259.36
Artifact
SHA256 51A…9AF
Source
Findings (non-IoC)

Evidence ledger

Ranked by severity · findings with a source location link to the code viewer

12 detail rows

Publisher Evidence

High

JetBrains

Publisher identity, store signals, distribution reach, and warning signals used for context. Treat this as supporting evidence, not a clean bill of health.

100
Noisy-finding weight
x0.50
Publisher domain
jetbrains.com
Trusted match
Store verification signal
Verified publisher
Verified
Extension portfolio
945
Portfolio

12 evidence rows available.

Finding Categories

AI Security Report

AI Security Review

Evidence context: threat category none; evidence quality strong.

This Docker extension from JetBrains s.r.o. shows no security concerns. The 11 findings in the analysis are all information-level hash metadata entries for bundled JAR libraries in the clouds-docker-impl/lib/ directory, including com.github.docker-java-docker-java-api.jar, intellij.clouds.docker.jar, and clouds-docker-impl.jar. These hash values are standard dependency tracking, not security findings.

The extension's filesystem and process access is fully justified by its stated purpose. A Docker integration plugin must read Docker configuration files, interact with the Docker daemon, and potentially execute Docker commands to provide container management functionality within the IDE. The bundled libraries—docker-java-core.jar, docker-java-transport.jar, intellij.clouds.docker.terminal.jar—are legitimate dependencies for Docker Java API integration and terminal functionality. There are zero findings indicating unauthorized file access, credential theft, or data exfiltration.

Credential-access findings are absent entirely. The findings summary shows zero matches in the secret category, meaning no code was detected reading .env files, .git/config, SSH keys, cloud credentials, or VS Code's secret storage. The extension does not exhibit any of the credential theft patterns that would be concerning for a Docker plugin, which typically needs to access Docker daemon credentials but not developer secrets.

The strongest counterargument to this verdict would be that any IDE extension with Docker capabilities could theoretically be used to exfiltrate data or execute malicious commands. However, this concern does not apply here because: (1) JetBrains s.r.o. is the verified publisher on the official JetBrains marketplace, (2) the extension has over 26 million users indicating widespread trusted adoption, (3) there are zero malware signatures, zero IoC matches, and zero obfuscation findings, and (4) the bundled libraries are standard Docker Java API dependencies with no suspicious behavior detected. The hash metadata findings are expected for any extension distributing compiled JAR libraries and carry no security implications.

This extension represents a legitimate development tool from a trusted vendor with no indicators of malicious behavior. The findings are entirely consistent with a well-maintained Docker integration plugin.

Key Reasons

  • Official JetBrains s.r.o. publisher on verified marketplace
  • Zero malware signatures, IoCs, or credential-access findings
  • All 11 findings are benign hash metadata for bundled JAR dependencies
  • 26+ million users indicate trusted, widely-adopted extension

False Positive Considerations

  • Hash metadata findings are benign dependency tracking, not security issues
  • Zero actual security findings (malware, IoC, secrets, obfuscation all at 0)
  • Official JetBrains publisher with verified marketplace presence

Reviewed 2026-05-23; recommended action: suppress false positive; model confidence 95%.

JetBrains version history

Risk trend by version

17 analyzed versions. Each point is the latest successful scan for that version; failed zero-score scans are hidden. Dates are based on first seen by risky plugins.

Selected
21
Change since first
No change
Change from previous
No change
Versions:
First analyzed version
261.23567.72
Apr 16, 2026
Risk range
21 to 50
Across analyzed versions
Latest analyzed version
263.6259.36
Oct 1, 2026
Selected version
low
Version
v263.6259.36
Today
Risk score
21
Findings
12
Change vs previous
No change

Pick any point on the chart to explore that version's code below.

About This Extension

Imagine being able to package your entire application with all its code, libraries, and dependencies into a single, portable unit that runs consistently in any...

Frequently Asked Questions